Pearl Jewelry - The Story of Pearl Hunters
As long as pearl jewelry have been known to people, they have been a
highly sought commodity for their beauty. It's only in recent times
however that the industry has taken the hunt for the perfect pearl to
a whole different level. Today, the shiny orbs that we see on in
display in jewelry stores have actually almost always been grown in
farms.
That's a far cry from the dangerous extraction and collection methods
used before the invention of modern technology. In the past, not more
than 100 years ago, the only way to retrieve pearls was by diving in
lakes, floods and the ocean to pick them up, one at the time. The
unfortunate divers who'se job it was to do this, were often poor and
lured by the relative large sums they could get. The diver would
sometimes have to dive as deep as 100 feet on one single breath of
air. In order to preserve air and to stay submerged the longest, the
divers would hold on to heavy stones on the way down.
Naturally, this dangerous activity was reserved for the desperate or
the powerless - in many cases slaves or extremely poor peasents.
Today, this method is all but obsolete in most places of the world.
The cheaper cultured pearls have become popular and are many times
the only pearls available to the consumer.
There are however still a few isolated areas that practice this old
art of pearl diving. Some of the finest natural pearl speciments come
from the gulf of Bahrain. Here, divers still risk their health to
retrieve what are considered the top of the crop in the world. In
fact, Bahrain wants no part of the sale of cultured pearls, banned
from trade. Bahrain is one of the few places on earth that does an
active job in trying to preserve the natural habitat and waters from
pollution.
It's an interesting story and one that continues to fascinate buyers
around the world. Somehow, the beauty of the pearl grows when it's
been retrieved from the depth of the ocean.
Buying Pearl Jewelry Without Being Ripped Off
Buying pearl jewelry can be fun, exciting and confusing. Whether you're considering a gift of pearl jewelry for someone special or as a treat for yourself, take some time to learn the terms used in the industry. Here's some information to help you get the best quality pearl jewelry for your money, whether you're shopping in a traditional brick and mortar store or online.
Pearls
Natural or real pearls are made by oysters and other mollusks. Cultured pearls also are grown by mollusks, but with human intervention; that is, an irritant introduced into the shells causes a pearl to grow. Imitation pearls are man-made with glass, plastic, or organic materials.
Because natural pearls are very rare, most pearls used in jewelry are either cultured or imitation pearls. Cultured pearls, because they are made by oysters or mollusks, usually are more expensive than imitation pears. A cultured pearl's value is largely based on its size, usually stated in millimeters, and the quality of its nacre coating, which give it luster. Jewelers should tell your if the pearls are cultured or imitation. Some black, bronze, gold, purple, blue and orange pearls, whether natural or cultured, occur that way in nature; some, however, are dyed through various processes. Jewelers should tell you whether the colored pearls are naturally colored, dyed or irradiated.
Clams, oysters, mussels and many other mollusks with limy shells are known to produce pearls. But very few kinds yield gem pearls of jeweler's quality. The pearl is an abnormal growth of mother-of-pearl, or nacre, imbedded in the soft bodies of these shellfish. It is built up, layer upon layer, in the same way as nacre is added to the lining of the growing shell and always has the same color and luster. For example, over the country, hundreds of good-sized pearls are found each year in the oysters we eat. Unfortunately these have no commercial value regardless of whether they have been cooked or not because they are dull opaque white or purple like the shell of the parent oyster. In recent times almost all pearls of gem quality come from the oriental pearl oyster which has a bright shimmering translucent nacre.
A pearl starts growing when some irritating foreign substance such as a sand grain, bit of mud, parasite or other object becomes lodged in the shell-producing gland called the mantle. Pearls formed in the soft flesh where nacre can be added on all sides are most likely to be spherical and the most highly prized. By far the great majority are flattened or variously distorted and have little value. Size, color, luster and freedom from flaws are other essential qualities. Unlike other gems, such as diamonds, pearls have an average life of only about 50 years. In time the small amount of water in a pearl's make-up is lost and its surface cracks. Because they are mostly lime, necklaces which are worn often are injured by the acid secretions of the human skin.
The media helped Yeltsin win the elections in 1996
It was the time of Gorbachev's perestroika. The country was discovering the truth about the past and beginning to breathe more freely. The atmosphere was reflected in articles published at that time. Journalists felt exhilarated as they became involved in the democratization of society. The press had an important role to pearl pendant play and influenced political transformation.
Lyudmila Resnyanskaya, a journalism professor at Moscow State University, described the period as being "full of romantic beliefs." The press was playing the function of the fourth estate. "It was the opposition – sometimes a constructive opposition," she said. "The media felt they could use their voice [to change things] – that's the model of the fourth estate."
The media were government-financed and had no idea about a market economy. "This created a lot of paradoxes," she said. "The media were completely against the structure that gave them the means of subsistence."
Gorbachev had an important role in press freedom – even though that seems to have been forgotten in Russia. He talked about glasnost, "a word meant to build a dialogue," Resnyanksaya said. "We have to remember [his speech] at the 19th conference of the [Communist] Party when he said to the party officials that they were suffering from 'deafness.'"
Glasnost meant freedom of speech, and Gorbachev found himself in the difficult situation of creating a society ready to accept this new concept. He had the merit of sparking the flame of freedom of speech. "The consequences of glasnost were very complex," Resnyanskaya said. The press went overboard in reporting negative facts, forgetting the positive side of things. "They simply talked a lot but didn't offer any analysis," she said pearl jewelry.
The Russian media's enthusiasm ended in 1992, after the fall of the Soviet Union, when they lost their freedom from ideology and become dependent on their new owners.
President Boris Yeltsin had an important role to play in this situation. He let the media speak loudly, but he also turned the blind eye to privatization.
In spite of all that, some journalists now look back fondly on Yeltsin's leadership and describe him as a "convinced supporter" of a free press. Others say that perception was convenient for Yeltsin. "He was playing the role of the democrat," Resnyanskaya said.
The media helped Yeltsin win the elections in 1996. They were so afraid the Communists would come to power that they felt they had no choice. Journalists lied, misinformed, manipulated and wrote paid articles.
"In this way," Resnyanskaya said, "they privatized their right to speak, and they did it for money; they commercialized it. Of course, they have a lot of regrets. ... Now it is time for Russian journalists to freshwater pearl bracelets think about ethical principles. At least they have realized that press freedom is important and cannot be bought with money."
This was all immediately dubbed
These three events are Putin's proposals for tax reforms that would encourage the development of small business, the commander of the united military force in Chechnya's order to pearl jewelry carry out "soft cleansing," and the victory of Yevgeny Kiselyov's team in the bid for the TV6 broadcasting license. But though these all look like steps in the right direction, concerns remain. This is especially true of the TV6 case, which provoked the most open public discussion.
The fate of Kiselyov and his team served as a test for the Kremlin on freedom of speech. Kiselyov's team, recognized as one of the most professional in Russia, lost their outlets and their jobs twice in the course of one year, first at NTV, then at TV6. The TV6 case was not only an attack on freedom of speech, but also on property rights, since the channel, which had no debts, was taken from the owner of 75 percent of its shares. After this, few in Russia or abroad could believe the Kremlin's assertions that this was just a commercial dispute and had no political overtones.
When TV6 was pulled off the air in January, it was a shock for the public and sent ripples around the world that did nothing for the Kremlin's image. It looks a logical next step to let the TV6 journalists set up a new broadcasting company, win the license and get back all they had before, as it were. That is how the Kremlin wants it to look, but in reality, the team won't have the freedom they had before.
One can only guess at the behind-the-scenes talks and the pressure that convinced the journalists to freshwater pearl join forces with a powerful team of businesspeople and politicians close to the Kremlin. The most prominent figure in this lineup is former Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov, known for his dislike of journalists.
It wasn't just chance that after the tender results were announced, Primakov and his partner in the company, Arkady Volsky, began talking about "internal censorship" for journalists. Volsky, who is head of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs and used to work as an assistant to Soviet-era Communist Party boss Yury Andropov, proposed the term "self-censorship" rather than "internal censorship." Then someone suggested the term "self-limitation" so as to avoid the word censorship altogether. Whatever the terms, the TV channel's new overseers didn't hide that they think it perfectly normal to bring back the "internal editor" of the Soviet times that became a symbol of an enslaved conscience more difficult to bear than any censor appointed from outside.
This points to what is really happening: The independent journalists viewers all know will once again appear on the screens, and Primakov and his colleagues will make sure that behind the democratic decorations a completely different play takes place.
The same doubts apply to the order in Chechnya about "soft cleansing." These operations have long since become senseless and cruel punitive actions. The military behaves as it pleases during these operations, looting civilians, killing people using defense from rebels as gemstone necklace a pretext and arresting men not part of any fighting for supposed checks, after which they vanish, their bodies occasionally turning up in a common grave somewhere.
The new order bans the military from covering their faces with masks and hiding the numbers of their armored vehicles. It also requires operation commanders to identify themselves when entering a house and to draw up protocols of searches and checks carried out.
This was all immediately dubbed "soft cleansing" by wits. Indeed, it's hard to imagine a Chechen family demanding that a group of armed soldiers searching their home draw up a truthful and accurate protocol of everything they do. Whatever the case, attempts to solve a serious social and political problem through bureaucratic procedures don't promise any real results.
The authorities look to have more honest motives regarding the third piece of news – Putin's decision to reduce the tax burden for small businesses. This really is an important step that has been a decade too long in coming. Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin proposed what looks at first glance like a logical tax-break scheme, but entrepreneurs say the bureaucrats could easily manipulate the plan to cultured pearl make business even harder, not simpler. Only practice will show which side is right.
In a sense, all of this is good news. But this is little consolation for those who reject the return of even the smallest dose and mildest form of totalitarianism.
Not all circumstances today work in Russia's favor
Of course, relations between the Russian energy giants can't leave the state indifferent. Nor can the consequences that the quarrel could have had – shutting down power to thousands of businesses and millions of people. But it is not the state's job to make peace. The state should create conditions that would enable the squabbling parties to freshwater pearl reach an agreement themselves.
The quarrel between the two energy oligarchs wasn't normal for a market economy. The buyer – ' UES – wants more gas from Vyakhirev's company, but Vyakhirev refuses to sell more. In a normal market economy, this doesn't happen, and if it's happening in Russia, it means Russia hasn't yet quite developed its market.
The conflict backs this up. First, as Vyakhirev explains, he sells gas to domestic consumers at a price that doesn't cover his expenses and makes up for his losses only through exports. This is probably true; otherwise, he wouldn't refuse to sell more gas on the domestic market.
Second, the consumers, and above all UES, don't pay for gas supplies on time, but Vyakhirev can't stop supplying them because the state keeps him under heavy pressure. If Gazprom stops supplying gas to the energy companies, they in turn would cut off power supplies to their debtor-consumers, thus setting off unrest among the population – something the state fears.
The result is a dead-end situation. Instead of being treated, the patient is simply stuffed with painkillers. The state should let Vyakhirev sell gas at market prices and let energy companies take measures to deal with their debtors. If this means that poorer people suffer, then the state should provide them with targeted assistance. This would be a normal role for the state, a role free of the socialist parasitic past.
If quick and sustainable growth continues, other potential obstacles could put a cap on growth: transportion, fuel supplies and the capacity of the machine-building and metallurgical industries. Ultimately, everything comes down to akoya pearl necklace just two words – investment famine. Serious growth requires serious investment.
Growth in investment is the most important piece of news this year, though not yet fully appreciated by economic analysts. In January and February, investment in main capital stood at 106.3 percent compared with the same period last year. This is very modest growth by world standards, but in the Russian context, it is welcomed news, especially given that investment for the first two months of 1999 did not rise but fell to 86.3 percent of the 1998 level for the same period. Investment has picked up then by 20 percentage points, from 86.3 to 106.3, and has gone from negative to positive.
This is not the only good economic news to come out of recent days. For January and February, Russian exports increased one-and-a-half-fold over the same period last year, while imports rose only slightly. The result was a record positive trade balance of $9.5 billion for two months.
The good industrial growth of last year has so far been maintained and, despite forecasts to the contrary, has even picked up in pace. Industrial output for January and February reached 113 percent compared with the same period last year.
And finally, consumers are not paying for the increase in output with a decrease in income, as was the situation between 1997-1999. Real incomes have risen to nugget pearl 104.3 percent compared to last year. This is only slight growth and it doesn't compensate for the drop in incomes over past years, but it is growth nonetheless.
Economic analysts say these successes are not the state's doing – the state didn't do anything particular except not get in the way and not spoil the positive effect of favorable objective circumstances.
This is probably not quite so. Not all circumstances today work in Russia's favor. For a start, Russia hasn't received any external financing now for more than half a year. The losses this has caused the budget are comparable to what has been gained through high oil prices. But even without loans, Russia is paying its foreign debt – more than $2 billion in the first quarter, in excess of $3 billion in the second – and has even increased currency reserves by $3 billion over the last three months. Even more sensational, given the events of the last decade, is the fact that in March, Russia's inflation rate increased by less than that of the United States.
This can't be just pure coincidence. It could be that, finally, the years of effort by the reformers are paying off and the country's macroeconomic climate is improving. Market mechanisms are slowly beginning to akoya pearl necklace work.
support of a future bilateral energy agreement
Bush is scheduled to be in Russia for almost four days. This seems to be a very long time just to say that Washington appreciates Moscow's participation in the war against terrorism. How many days does it take to express thanks that no real fuss was created by Russia when the Bush administration announced unilateral U.S. withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty? How many hours will it take Bush or one of his handlers to pearl jewelry wholesale convince the Russian leader that free trade is only beneficial if doesn't hurt industries back home?
We can expect a lot of backslapping and shashlyk-eating at the summit, but no boozing, as Bush found religion on his 40th birthday after years of hard partying. Content-wise, the summit could be a bit sticky for both sides, as anything of substance would likely lead to more domestic criticism of Putin's pro-West stands – especially on the subject of what Russia has gained from this "new relationship."
Bush clearly is a politician who prefers sound bites. Putin, disappointingly enough, appears to be reading from the same lackluster page as his counterpart. Russia and Putin can and need to do better.
The upcoming summit is odd: There is no real reason to meet. I am reminded that an important arms-reduction agreement is being prepared for signing, and Jackson-Vanik may be repealed beforehand. But both are really meaningless in the scheme of things.
Both issues address the past relationship, not the present, including how both countries can and need to move forward. The Bush administration does not have a vision for its relationship with Russia – it is too preoccupied with trying to prove that the foreign policy of the current president's father, who served from 1989-93, was correct. Putin can take comfort in a strange way – it's a Bush roadshow, which means it is a Russia sideshow. At the very least, Bush will demonstrate that Russia is important only because he likes Putin. This is not an acceptable U.S. foreign policy concerning Russia.
A new arms-control agreement between the two countries serves America's geopolitical purposes and gently disguises Russia's economic weakness. Russia can protest all it wants, but the dollars and cents of arms control caught up with pearl earrings the country a long time ago. The Bush people are doing Russia a favor by not rubbing it in too much. In the longer term, Russia's security interests are really about economic reform at home. Significantly downgrading differences concerning an arms-control agreement is a strategy Putin should pursue, or, at the very least, he should use such differences to bolster Russia's economy. Trading a tough stance on arms control for support of a future bilateral energy agreement makes a lot more sense.
Repealing Jackson-Vanik is more an American embarrassment than a favor for the Kremlin. If Washington can recognize Kazakstan as a market economy, why is there even debate to recognize Russia? Leakage of various political and policy agendas came to an end long ago. That the Bush administation accepted Pakistan's recent presidential referendum without a fuss, but still has to convince Congress that the Russia of today is different from the Soviet Union, is something verging on surreal.
Putin will be patient because he has to be. Bush helps veil his counterpart's shortcomings and failings. The quagmire of Chechnya defines the failure to understand nationalism in the past century, and the meaning of national identity in the new one. The conflict serves as a daily, senseless testament to pearl jewelry the Soviet legacy of misunderstanding.
Yusup is in need of additional surgery to avoid the onset of gangrene
Moscow, it seems, has regained the ability to effectively utilize propaganda and is now openly conducting an "information war" parallel to its military campaign. The public relations battle this time stands in stark contrast to akoya pearl necklace the bungled media policy during the 1994-1996
Chechen war. So how does one penetrate the "spin" and gain a real understanding of the situation in the breakaway republic? With great difficulty.
The Chechen authorities and commanders of militant forces in the republic have not helped either - they are as secretive as the Russians about the nature of the struggle.
Moreover, in recent years reporters have been more prized in the North Caucasus as valuable kidnap victims than as helpful mediums to relay the true situation in Chechnya. As a result, few journalists have ventured into the republic.
One thing is certain about Russia's campaign in the southern republic, however, ordinary Chechens are no longer talking about independence, much less fighting for it. The choice today is between life and death, and they are struggling for their survival.
Almost every refugee interviewed for this article said they believe that Russia wants to rule a republic free of Chechens.
The displaced say that if the Russian authorities really wanted to eliminate "terrorists" - such as field commanders Shamil Basayev and Khattab - the military would not be bombing civilians and randomly targeting villages. Nowhere else in the world, refugees say, are surface-to-surface missiles being used to fight terrorism.
The victims of the Russian Armed Forces' tactics in this campaign are much in evidence - some 40 wounded refugees lie in the central hospital of Sunzha in Ingushetia.
One of them is 14-year-old Yusup Magomedov from the Chechen village of Novo-Sharoi.
Yusup was playing outside with 18 other children near his house on the morning of Oct. 23 when a tank shell exploded nearby. Eight of the children died and Yusup was badly wounded in the legs.
"I tried to take him to blister pearl the Urus-Martan hospital [in Ingushetia], his mother, Leila Magomedova, says, "but the federal authorities [didn't] open the corridor [out of Chechnya] for a long time."
The boy and his mother spent five days waiting at the border.
Doctors appealed to border guards to allow the two civilians to pass, "but they would not provide a corridor," Magomedova says.
"On the sixth day, a physician came up to me and, crying, said that if a corridor had been opened earlier my son could have been able to preserve his legs."
Yusup's legs were amputated above the knees inside Chechnya. Shortly after, Russia opened the border with Ingushetia. But that was also an ordeal. "We spent some three hours in the ambulance at the border as guards searched us with dogs," Magomedova recalls. "I feared my son would die and even thought about how I would bury him. ..."
Meanwhile, Magomedova's husband and three daughters remain in Chechnya. She doesn't know how they are living, nor does she know what she and Yusup will do next. The pair have no money, and Yusup is in need of additional surgery to avoid the onset of gangrene.
Another refugee, Luiza Asukhanova, was in the central market in the Chechen capital Grozny on Oct. 21 with her 15-year-old daughter, Zurikhan, when a missile struck. The blast tore the girl's arm off above the elbow and imbedded shrapnel in her stomach.
Luiza recounted the scene shortly after the attack. "I saw parts of human bodies being torn off, but people didn't seem to tin cup pearl necklace notice," she says. "They ran, jumping over dead bodies. I also ran, pulling my daughter with me as she was too stunned to move."
FREE Blog at Beeplog.com
Responsible for the content of the member blogs are our members, not the provider, Beepworld GmbH
|
